I think this resonates with @Aelkus thread from earlier in the day. People really undervalue how much the funhouse mirrors distort perception. Outside looking in, people see obvious grift or projection. But, inside looking out...it can be Kaufman-esque.
https://twitter.com/Aelkus/status/1108002878730526720 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 Retweeted
I think we agree. And, the grift *is* extremely pervasive. But a lot of the people in my feed -- and me, sometimes too -- experience a cathartic release in calling things a grift, and mistakenly assume they're somehow inoculated from similar seduction. https://twitter.com/Aelkus/status/1108006821560758272 …
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 added,
This Tweet is unavailable.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That depends on the social environment that envelops you too, though. E.g., on here, my network is more leftist, so that baseline is omnipresent and useful, but risks people forgetting that their motivations can produce similar fuckery, too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But, really, I think we're just talking about differences in relative effect sizes with respect to different subpopulations which isn't very useful. Except, I'm the one who hoped into your mentions to talk about the thing I wanted to talk about instead.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.