2/ That clarity (i.e., good scicomm) actively sweeps complexity as well as countervailing evidence and theories (disagreement) under the rug, because of course it does -- those things aren't salable. People buy popsci for that feeling of wonder *and* the resolution uncertainty.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ I don't think that's inherently a problem. Science popularizers are great -- they popularize science! It's that third step that does the real damage. When the communicators become more like heroic Oracles for [reasons].
Show this thread -
4/ I don't really have a point, more like a nascent thought stream I'm trying to follow but can't because I have to attend to last minute edits on my defense slides. But I wanted to bookmark this idea.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.