Related: I'm really into #openscience approaches that acknowledge and design with this in mind.
I want,
1. Access to your analytical code and data; and,
2. An appreciation of my time.https://twitter.com/generativist/status/1105576214339698696 …
-
Show this thread
-
I don't mean (2) rhetorically, like "thanks for reading." I mean, if we're all admitting most of what we share is envelope for messages, couldn't we design a better envelope?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 Retweeted Mike Bostock
We already know this is true for learning. For example,
@mbostock's 6 short paragraphs plus this animation let me understand Bridson's poisson-disc sampling algorithm quickly and intuitively because the medium is a very well designed envelop.https://twitter.com/mbostock/status/475074766936629249?lang=en …💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 added,
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread
Why are academic papers thought to be (simultaneously), 1. No-fluff, technical reports for research findings; and, 2. Written in a way that facilitates skimming? Something seems wrong in that formulation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.