Related: Tfw criticism of the ingroup intended as part of normal self-improvement is intercepted by the outgroup & spun as evidence of resistance to self improvement.
-
-
Or spun as evidence that, “Even these guys acknowledge that their group is wrongheaded.” (Once again, however, this is an example of asymmetric polarization. One side engages in much more of this sort of bad faith cherry-picking than the other—and we all know which side it is.)
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
I mean...I don't think it's possible to spot it, that's why it's devastatingly corrosive. You need env cues and mechanisms in place as interrupts. Otherwise, you can just try to repair retrospectively, and this site is pretty good at quantifying the feather-weight of retractions.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
All of which are pretty good signs of being on tilt. Meanwhile, they're quantifiable. I'd love to have a tool that actually highlighted, say, tweets for these detectable patterns as you did composition. What gets measured *beforehand* gets managed.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I mean, it's also the basic implication of most dual-process and affective intelligence theories, esp Lodge and Taber's Rationalizing Voter.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.