Right but why are we not talking about that as the problem? Escalating dopamine from simulated, superficial connections to hundreds or thousands of avatars feels like a fundamentally poor way to get dopamine.
-
-
All the biggest networks play the balancing act well, where they increase the attentional costs in a way compensated for the dopamine hits. I don't see how you beat that with a *free* network.
-
Even if you had graph portability, you have to retain the users using your service. Metcalfe = Network x DAU. If you increase inhibitory power, you can't sell as many ads and, as a consequence, resources for competition.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.