Hrm. When I worked at one, I did drink A LOT of Maker's Mark...
I mostly agree with that (esp. since I think negative partisanship is an artifact globing over a bunch of well-sorted group identities). And the angle I always see is just: how can we smash together groups in a way that benefits us, however it's defined.
-
-
And ideological rationalizations filtered by those group interests works well in doing so, especially for the "policy elites."
-
E.G. "Why hasn't <think tank X> spent attention on <issue y> something they REALLY oppose?!" Because <issue y> implicates the GOP and right now, the GOP is serving the bulk of their (donor's) interests.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.