-
-
Replying to @generativist
R is better if your work output is ideas/communication oriented. Reports, tables, notebooks, graphs etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kareem_carr
My Jupyter/Pandoc workflow makes reporting pretty comparable. But, 9/10 times when I come across a really brilliant portrayal of something and try to figure out where it came from, it's R.
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist @kareem_carr
My dissertation workflow: - Jupyter notebooks for all prose and analysis; - Cells marked with "setup" or "private" don't get included in compilation - Cells marked with "output-generator" included only outputs (graphs, tables, etc) - Files lexicographically sorted and packaged
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist @kareem_carr
E.G. 01_Motivation/ 02_Design/ 02_Design/001_Title.ipynb etc
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist @kareem_carr
I have a makefile that turns the whole thing into one PDF and if I want, reruns the whole thing. R has more mature stuff in this area, but the gap between mine is small. But the graphs are so much prettier. (And tables too. I gotta write a package for that. Low hanging fruit.)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist
write a package ... or use to R ... Rmarkdown supports Python by the way ... so you don't necessarily have to change the bulk of your code. Not right now thought! Gotta get that thesis over with.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 Retweeted 💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫
Yes. No more yak shaving! (But yes, I agree ;))https://twitter.com/generativist/status/1103384341709762563 …
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.