E.G. Women are under-cited because they are under-read because they are under-cited because they have less signalling value (fewer historical opportunities) and they're less bundled with cannon because of the ensuing preferential attachment problems.
-
-
(Plus, the intellectual chain of custody argment is a farce anyway, especially in the historical context. Again, eg: how many women's ideas and theories have their bosses name on them alone?!)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.