This is exactly the problem that's been motivating a lot of my recent "spare time" explorations. If we're all arguing over projections of our beliefs — views of reality — it would be really nice to reflexively see everyone's basis. Otherwise, we lose track of what's asserted.https://twitter.com/kareem_carr/status/1088137191614763008 …
-
-
I think I'd like to see higher level maps though. Especially ones that are pragmatic in the sense that they help you quickly perceive what and *why* someone is arguing.
-
...because in a really weird way, I think that's what we all do on twitter via stereotyping -- reject ideas and perspectives by implicitly (and noisily!) imputing someone's epistemological (and moral) positions. I want better and more careful decompositions!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.