This is exactly the problem that's been motivating a lot of my recent "spare time" explorations. If we're all arguing over projections of our beliefs — views of reality — it would be really nice to reflexively see everyone's basis. Otherwise, we lose track of what's asserted.https://twitter.com/kareem_carr/status/1088137191614763008 …
-
-
Any thoughts on what one would read?
-
A great question -- and, please share your answers, too! I'm kinda muddling through. Right now I'm reading The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. I've seen Lakatos cited so many times but never read his stuff. Always thought, "Popper and Kuhn are good enough."
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.