I think it’s...a weird hydra. Specific contexts generate new ones as participants sort themselves and leaders allocate followers’ attention. I’m interested in decomposing the “why and what?” Because I think theres a role for better salience...planning.
-
-
-
But it also may be beyond the horizon of predictable, so as a default I prefer your everywhere approach.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think its mostly about resources. Norms in specific contexts are just ephemeral arenas. To the winner goes portable authority and allegiances. (This is a hot take I’m working through.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh no, I think you were clear but I answered wrt the quetion I’m toying with because my brain is digesting. Our complex research space isn’t the easiest to discuss in tweets :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes that happened to me too. Engaging does provide oxygen to folks like him which may sustain the fuckery. But there is also clear, inplied harm, so ceding the space without compelling reasons not to starts to feel like cowardice or indifference
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, I feel similarly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My focus is on the first part — how do we decompose the motivations and information sources that get congealed in norms?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. And i think thats how the norms work as battlefronts — through salience. The two norms (as contexts) partition groups very differently!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does it seem more often to be over who is leading <the group> or who is in <the group> ?
-
(Not snark) both?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.