Subtweeting papers is hard. 1) There are systemic issues in DL (et al) publishing; 2) Expressed frustrations are salient; 2) Twitter algo forges a niche, viral focal point. End result: Individual authors flagellated to absolve the fields' sins, without institutional change.https://twitter.com/henripal/status/1066800850113318913 …
This isn't a criticism of @henripal. I did the same then deleted my post recently, too. It's just that particular instances match a general schema and then stand in for the issue itself.
The medium is the problem, not the peer review.