1/ Clearer explanation: You have an objective function that takes a vector X of n issues and returns a vector Y of how much each matters. You can only cover m (< n) of them. You *should* sample them in proportion to Y. The mixture would be a good allocation of attention.https://twitter.com/generativist/status/1060663285366706176 …
-
Show this thread
-
2/ Instead, corporate, cultural, and platform pressures compel the selection of the top m issues alone. The remaining n - m issues get insufficient attention, if any at all. (And, the synchronization itself induces pathologies beyond those of misallocated attention.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @perineuronalphd
I am! I'll watch it later, thanks! (A lot of what I'm saying comes from my dissertation on belief expression and discovery. I sure hope it aligns with the neuroscience more than superficially!)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I haven't. I tried for a monograph (mistake!) But, I'm *very very very* close to done, so I'll share it with you soon, if you'd like. In the mean time, I do have a blog if you're interested. Feel free to DM me if you have more ideas! https://dispatches.artifexdeus.com/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.