2/ Instead, corporate, cultural, and platform pressures compel the selection of the top m issues alone. The remaining n - m issues get insufficient attention, if any at all. (And, the synchronization itself induces pathologies beyond those of misallocated attention.)
1/ Clearer explanation: You have an objective function that takes a vector X of n issues and returns a vector Y of how much each matters. You can only cover m (< n) of them. You *should* sample them in proportion to Y. The mixture would be a good allocation of attention.https://twitter.com/generativist/status/1060663285366706176 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.