1/ Hot take:
I'm at the "stick to convention and swallow your pride to get it #phdone" stage of my #phdlife. But, I'm going to vent on here and say that I don't think ODD, ODD+D, and things like beautifully-rendered UML are useful.
And, often, they are harmful.
Eh. Sometimes. But, more often than not I think it's symptomatic of UML not easily representing what code represents easily.
-
-
I get that, too. Easy-to-read UML is a simplification of (only part of) the code, which is a simplification of the system (as we see it), which is only a part of the world (that we subjectively perceive), ...
-
I'd rather informal and ad-hoc XKCD-style diagrams. The formality of UML is part of the problem for me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.