Violence is bad. Political violence is bad. There are instances of political violence "on both sides."
-
Show this thread
-
One "side" executes more more violence than the other. One "side" has more power than the other. One "side" can deescalate the threat of violence "on both sides" but chooses not to. One "side" willfully stokes violence. "Both sides" are not equally at fault.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likesShow this thread -
"On both sides" is a false-equivalence wrt threats and reality. But it's effective propaganda. Risk assessment is subjective, and in contemporary America -- where the President deliberately lies to obliterate shared perspectives -- the reweighing collapses to proof by existence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
1 : 1 :: Red : Blue "On both sides"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
2 : 1 :: Red : Blue "On both sides."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
4 : 1 :: Red : Blue "On both sides."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
8 : 1 :: Red : Blue "On both sides."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
Numbers don't matter. Reality doesn't matter. All that matters is the existence of a pretense that lets the born on third contingent and the Evangelicals erase the means used to secure their malignantly selfish ends. Terror.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.