from psychohistory import microjudgments
-
-
-
In all seriousness though, it was meant as something playful, but two people have said something like, "that's a bold claim" or "do you really want to invite that comparison to CSS?" So, now I'm not confident in it even though it's tongue-in-cheek.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
scikit-yearn
-
Probability of this going from 404 to 200 by the end of the day?pic.twitter.com/HFj5rIlb0o
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would say change solely on the fact readers might question the relevance to certain key terms and the title. Like when I first saw ‘psychohistory’ I literally though a meta-analysis on psych (whether it be the -ology or the -iatry). I was hounded about this in my papers lol
-
I think 99% of people in my field read Asimov's Foundation series so they wouldn't see that. But, I also think the relevance would then be, "uh...so, fiction?"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Harry Seldon approves... From thousands of years ago. :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.