Turns out BLOOD FATHER *is* something to write home about, and that -something is Mel Freakin' Good-to-Have-You-Back Gibson.
-
-
Replying to @HoneyHoxley
Yes, he was great and brought a fire that didn't deserve his performance. The rest - not so much.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @geekboy73
He went positively Nicholson in one scene! (while still somehow retaining his Melness). I was pleasantly stoked.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HoneyHoxley
He was infinitely better than the dialogue or the material afforded him. If it was 3D, we'd have seen the veins popping in neck
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @geekboy73
The script was flawed but I actually found it endearing for its non-Hollywoodness, TBH - moments were more real (if unpolished).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @HoneyHoxley
As a small indie, it just about succeeds. But without Mel, it's nothing but hoary old cliches that failed to ignite
2:25 AM - 22 Aug 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.