@leaflemming @geekboy73 Isn't it weird how we'd want viewers to have that same experience, and yet...
-
-
Replying to @LiamMaguren
@leaflemming
@geekboy73 ...we still write under the assumption that they haven't seen the film yet?4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LiamMaguren
@LiamMaguren @leaflemming ..worth their time or money. Which is problematic in ways, but understandable?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @geekboy73
@geekboy73 @leaflemming Oh wow, I think you've completely justified the 'star rating' system, Darren.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LiamMaguren
@LiamMaguren @leaflemming PS which review is this for, Liam?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @geekboy73
@geekboy73 @leaflemming No review, just been curious about this thought for a while.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LiamMaguren
@LiamMaguren Am curious to your comment about justifying ratings???1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @geekboy73
@geekboy73 It's a way of saying "you should/shouldn't see this" without actually saying anything...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LiamMaguren
@LiamMaguren Not sure, given that people still go to 1 star films and avoid 5 star efforts. Writing gives light and shade to those numbers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @geekboy73
@geekboy73 They do, but it doesn't require you to read the "experience-shaping" opinion to get a (very) rough gauge of seeing it or not.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@LiamMaguren True, but also depends on writer. What I give 3, you may give 4 and others different scores. But the writing will shape why
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.