Gautham Rao NO guns in classrooms

A "You cannot make this stuff up" tweet (https://twitter.com/gauthamrao/status/930282029538824192 …). He writes this on the very day the 3rd and last Plaintiffs'-side amicus set of briefs is due in the 3 Foreign Emoluments Clause cases.

Seth it was a joke.

Was this a joke too? In your CREW v. Trump brief: "As holders of an office “of trust” under the United States, electors would also be subject to the clause." Or did you mean that? page 17, note 59.

Congressional Research Service: “The truth of the matter is that the electors are not ‘officers’ at all ....” (citing U.S. v. Hartwell (1868)), https://www.congress.gov/content/conan/pdf/GPO-CONAN-2017-9-3.pdf …

“Electors are—by definition—neither (1) ‘Senator[s] or Representative[s],’ nor (2) ‘Person[s] holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States.’” Vasan Kesavan, The Very Faithless Elector?, 104 W. Va. L. Rev. 123, 129 (2001), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=607121 ….