Endorse. 100%.
-
-
-
There's so much trust being lost, I'd like to know, if
@WHO fails to react to the groundswell of expert and public opinion demanding an unbiased and balanced SAGO cohort, what else can be done, with or without their involvement or cooperation? - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It would be far better to add people like Alina Chan and Jessie Bloom to the group rather than have them replace so many outstanding scientists. It was a mistake to tar all lab leak proponents as conspiracy theorists, but should not be a criteria for removal.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
WHO has been informed these persons have disqualifying conflicts of interest and prejudgments. If WHO proceeds with confirming these persons as SAGO members, then WHO will have failed, again, to meet even minimal standards of due diligence and responsibility to the global public.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good to see Dr Drosten on your list. I listen to his podcasts in Germany. He continually plays down the lab leaked possibility. Or his Oct 2 Tweet
@c_drosten refering to China's Wildlife Farm Industry. Always the same narrative. And not objective.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not have a MUCH broader body around the World FIRST agree on what the goals, questions, desired “fruits” and methods of the investigation should be? Then, the smaller group chosen would execute. Otherwise, we likely see a small group w/ COI parroting Collins/Fauci/Hotez etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.