-
-
-
Just imagine shifting all of those classic Financial Times "vaccine effect" graphs backward by 6 to 8 weeks. Massive numbers of lives saved. If only we had approved the vaccines before the 2020 election.pic.twitter.com/WaFFyQl59A
Näytä tämä ketju -
Imagine preventing a big chunk of the 3000-per-day deaths in December 2020, January, and February 2021. We likely could've had that with an October 2020 vaccine approval. Have the complicated, fits-and-starts January 2021 vaccine ramp-up in November instead, save lives.pic.twitter.com/AuDo6YNFAJ
Näytä tämä ketju -
Letter from "public health experts" encouraging Pfizer to delay the vaccine until.... ...late November.pic.twitter.com/teszrXqMkz
Näytä tämä ketju -
"Six days after receiving a letter from 65 top national health authorities, Pfizer Chairman and CEO Albert Bouria yesterday backed off earlier predictions that a COVID-19 vaccine would be ready for FDA emergency approval by October."https://ldi.upenn.edu/our-work/research-updates/five-ldi-senior-fellows-among-65-top-health-experts-in-letter-cautioning-pfizer-ceo-against-vaccine-approval-rush/ …
Näytä tämä ketju -
Coda: Even the Financial Times thought Speaker Pelosi was politicizing the vaccine race. Early October was a time of great fear--it was a time when it looked like vaccines could be approved very, very quickly. And a focal point emerged--an alternative: "Late November."pic.twitter.com/ilKqLFhkdE
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I think about this literally every time I see someone retweet him.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Would it have sped up production or would the “vaccines are approved but impossible to get” phase just have started 3-4 weeks earlier?
-
Moderna had tens of millions of doses ready to go.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.