Freedom of speech means nothing when it comes to private corporations... brush up on what those rights mean my dude
-
-
Replying to @garetmckinley @Grant34582715 and
If it's in the law then it means something, doesn't matter if it's a private company, they are based in USA.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vyperpunk92 @Grant34582715 and
They have the right to say what they want, but if YouTube deems that as breaking their ToS then they have the freedom to remove them. Even if you don't agree with it, that's how it works.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SomeCynt @vyperpunk92 and
Exactly. By their logic, every website which censors curse words would be violating the constitution.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @garetmckinley @vyperpunk92 and
Mhmm. I hate that FoS argument so fucking much because it's a scapegoat for idiots to use when they have no idea how things work.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SomeCynt @vyperpunk92 and
Wasn't trying to be an idiot that is what i have heard thank you for correcting me and saying what it really was
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Grant34582715 @vyperpunk92 and
You were one of the most correct people on the thread. Don't worry about it~ x)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SomeCynt @Grant34582715 and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGEsN1v9cZA … You guys should watch this video, freedom of speech is important and it does affect youtube and other social media sites. Alex Jones is lunatic, but he has right to be listened to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vyperpunk92 @SomeCynt and
Look, you literally don't know what freedom of speech covers, obviously, so you should really brush up on that first before you try and convince people of anything else.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @garetmckinley @SomeCynt and
I atleast replied something useful to the discussion, you just sat on your high horse and accused me not to know what freedom of speech covers. If you will reply then please reply something useful, if not, then just ignore the thread.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
-
-
Replying to @garetmckinley @vyperpunk92 and
That is the entire 1st amendment. Literally all it protects is the government from infringing on your freedom of speech. If you're a member of a private corporation's web site, you HAVE TO follow their terms, your rights ARE NOT guaranteed in this context.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @garetmckinley @vyperpunk92 and
There are literally thousands of articles explaining in much greater detail than I could ever break down in 240 characters. So instead of regurgitating the same stuff over and over, just google the topic. There is no shortage of reading material that will clear it up.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.