The most savage cuts for @NUL_Labour will come in the Kidsgrove Parish as 12 local councillors are reduced to 8 across the area. #NUL2017
-
If
@NUL_Labour had agreed to a 45 member council rather than 44 we wouldn't have this problem.
Libs wanted 15 triple member wards which would have obliterated local community connections to create horrid artificial wards.
-
-
And
@NUL_Labour wanted to gerrymander a whole array of single member wards in their favour. (1) -
Of course, Labour were the only party to propose keeping Keele as a discrete ward. Libs and Tories wanted to abolish it.
-
Re-read the final ld proposal. We supported a single mbr ward in Keele under condition that electoral nmbrs could be met, which they were.
-
Sorry James - your party clearly recommended Thistleberry and Keele.pic.twitter.com/liOozJ3mfU
-
The final submission had notes on Keele, which included conditions for Keele to be single member.
-
I'm sorry James - but that isn't what your party submitted to the LGBCE
-
See attached, we supported single member ward for Keele, under conditions. Hope you read parliamentary documents in more detail!pic.twitter.com/ZYMqD5wy6K
-
That's not a submission James. It's a single sentance footnote. Nice try though...
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Plus I see
@LGBCE preferred "artificial" multi to single members wards in most cases. -
Hardly - they propose a mix of single, double and a few triple member wards. Including saving communities the Libs wanted to disenfranchise.
-
Which communities are they? We also went into detail on how 45 mbrs would have been more representative - lab stuck with 44.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.