The framing of this issue is working. Instead of asking whether there was any immigration relief available for this man (and the concomitant question of why not?), we've got . . . this sort of thing.https://twitter.com/radleybalko/status/1159630443349782528 …
-
-
If you think that should change, there's a way to do that!
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They operate with a lot of prosecutorial discretion.
-
They do, although it's exceptionally unlikely that this fellow was going to get forbearance on that basis. No assistant chief counsel is gonna want it on their conscience (or their reputation) if they afford PD to a guy with known violent proclivities and he acts out again.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some form of forbearance is probably his only option, but nobody at DHS is gonna want it on their conscience (or reputation) if they afford leniency to a guy with known violent proclivities and then he hurts someone else.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Sure there is. Mental disorders can form the basis for particular social groups for asylum and related claims
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does the law literally compel authorities to expel a person in his circumstances, and offer them no alternatives? It seems like prosecutorial discretion was being used in the past to let people like this stay, is that perception wrong?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.