SCOTUS splits the baby on the census citizenship question, finds that adding it does not violate the enumeration clause and did not violate the Census Act. But remands on the ground that the agency did not adequately explain the decision to allow judicial review.
-
-
And, btw, if there is an October deadline, I would absolutely expect the courts to line things up for another, expedited, appearance at SCOTUS in the new term. But that rests on the question of the actual deadline for finalizing the questionnaire.
Show this thread -
The maj. op. would seem to allow additional agency decisionmaking, and SCOTUS did let stand subsequent amendments to questionable decisionmaking in the Travel Ban case. I'm not sure what that looks like for Commerce, though.
Show this thread -
So there're two issues left. The first is practical: is there time left before the census questionnaire has to be finalized? If not, it's over. The second is legal: can Commerce make a reasonable explanation *other* than the VRA rationale? But, you'd think they would've by now.
Show this thread -
On my read-through, no opinion addresses the ACLU's conspiracy theory that a secret anti-Hispanic study from 2015 animated Sec. Ross' decision to add the citizenship question. The closest we get is a reference from J. Alito to the question as being attacked as racist.pic.twitter.com/CEyQiqKbFt
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I’m still not sold this really strengthens the GOP much. (As the non-citizens who may not answer are dispersed in many states and the real power play comes when maps are drawn.)
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.