@dberkholz Trade associations doing what they always did, neutralising disruptive innovators.
-
-
Replying to @webmink
@webmink@dberkholz many of these were started by the disruptive innovators and put a neutral, long term support framework around a project1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @mdolan
@mdolan Can you expand that with an example please? /cc@dberkholz1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webmink
@webmink@dberkholz Which one wasn't? Define disruptive innovators? Smartbear for Swagger, Docker and CoreOS for OCI, PlumGrid for IO Visor?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mdolan
@mdolan I thought by “these” you meant the trade associations on the slide@dberkholz tweeted2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webmink
@webmink@mdolan@dberkholz Node.js is set to double in growth this year, so I don't see how it is "neutralized" :)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mikeal
@mikeal But Node.js Foundation was about neutralising the disruption to the corporations from io.js… /cc@mdolan@dberkholz2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webmink
@webmink@mdolan@dberkholz every contributor involved in io.js is part of the governing body of Node.js.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mikeal
@mikeal I’d say that disruption had been fully contained then! /cc@mdolan@dberkholz1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webmink
@webmink@mdolan@dberkholz that's an interesting interpretation, it's not conceivable than a continued split would reach the growth we have1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@mikeal @webmink @mdolan @dberkholz how many of those are actually The Linux Foundation?
-
-
Replying to @fuzzychef
@fuzzychef@webmink@mdolan@dberkholz you mean how many are independent 501(c)6's? IDK, but I know Node.js is :)0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.