Riccardo Fusaroli

@fusaroli

Social interactions and cognition, stats, computational modeling and machine learning, complex systems, language, and mental disorders. He/Him

Aarhus
Vrijeme pridruživanja: studeni 2008.

Medijski sadržaj

  1. 20. sij

    came to Aarhus to give an amazing talk () on her agent-based model investigating the role of diversity and of reproducibility in science, which is fully open and available on the net. 1/n

    Prikaži ovu nit
  2. 27. stu 2019.

    Hej , we tried randomly shuffling the sequence of parliamentary interventions to see whether the novelty/transience/resonance patterns was dependent on the sequence. Assuming no bug is found, we found very similar patterns. had you tried something like this?

  3. 4. stu 2019.

    deep into teaching prep

  4. 25. lip 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci
  5. 24. lip 2019.

    We are also trying to put our money where our mouth is. and me are running an informed follow-up study on ASD showcasing what the sys review is leading us to do and the consequences (sneak peak); 10/n

    Prikaži ovu nit
  6. 20. lip 2019.

    Evening spent learning about semantic dynamics in the Czech parliament. The students first reproduce 's French parliament results: novel speeches are more influential in the short term, then show that novelty plays a harsher price in the longer term

    Prikaži ovu nit
  7. 20. lip 2019.

    More cool stuff from my students: Relation between Theory of Mind ability (measured as ability to match arbitrary levels of TOM bots in a Matching Pennies game) and performance in a Traveler's Dilemma set-up (). [Steps away from 100 $ are bad]

  8. 4. lip 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    eheh. It's funny how funding agencies are catching up to good practices, only to make it harder for "better" practices ;-) ButYeah, this topic (impossibility of detailed anticipation of analysis) was also very nicely covered by in her IMC talk ()

  9. 23. svi 2019.

    Ewa Dabrowska commenting on the session:

    Prikaži ovu nit
  10. 23. svi 2019.

    Danes repair much less than Norwegians (and again, beware of task!)

    Prikaži ovu nit
  11. 23. svi 2019.

    Danes backchannel more than Norwegians (but beware: we see different behaviors in different tasks)

    Prikaži ovu nit
  12. 23. svi 2019.

    can we observe compensatory mechanisms at work in Danish conversations? Also: we should be very careful, since different conversations have different demands (affiliative, problem solving, etc.)

    Prikaži ovu nit
  13. 23. svi 2019.

    Danes relied on context more across a variety of conditions. We modeled both the actual answers, but also the underlying process using Drift Diffusion models

    Prikaži ovu nit
  14. 23. svi 2019.

    on "Preliminary results of a Danish and Norwegian categorical perception study"

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. 23. svi 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
  16. 5. svi 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci
  17. 4. svi 2019.

    Playing with how to contrastively represent the effects of using skeptical vs. informed (meta-analytic) priors. Too complex?

  18. 4. svi 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    just letting you know how it went ;-)

  19. 30. tra 2019.

    (improving the previous model and stratifying by all the previous variables). Higher parental lexical and syntactic alignment predict higher amounts of unique words for TD children, while higher syntactic and semantic alignment do so for children with ASD. 17/n

    Prikaži ovu nit
  20. 30. tra 2019.

    (e.g. to signal lack of understanding, joint attention or because of echolalia), thus generating 1s, sometimes we align only a few linguistic elements and develop on them. We have been working on modeling this appropriately a lot, but it's a bit beside the point here.

    Prikaži ovu nit

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·