@funnyordie Justin Bieber cover? Am I right?
Still not as bad as the time Rolling Stone put Mumford & Sons on the cover.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@funnyordie wow more left wing crapThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@funnyordie: Still not as bad as the time Rolling Stone put Mumford & Sons on the cover.”@NamasteCassieThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@funnyordie: Still not as bad as the time Rolling Stone put Mumford & Sons on the cover.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@funnyordie that mag was awesome...in 1991 with Alice in Chains on the cover...has continued to royally suck ass ever since. Give it up!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@funnyordie@kk5fan82 NOT COOL DAMMIT!!!!!@MumfordAndSons is the shit!!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@funnyordie It could have been worse. They could have put Sanford and Son on the cover.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@funnyordie they panicked, it was zero hour and all they had was Nickelback.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hahaha!
@aestheticgirl5 RT“@funnyordie: Still not as bad as the time Rolling Stone put Mumford & Sons on the cover.” -
@moreno_antonia BOO HISS!!!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“
@funnyordie: Still not as bad as the time Rolling Stone put Mumford & Sons on the cover.”@alexpittrussThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@funnyordie My answer to your particular tweet here is "or die".Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.