marxist definitions: exploitation: workers not recieving full objective compensation for labor alienation: the the worker being seperated from his labor. which means workers are dehumanized because they aren't fully involved in every stage of production.
-
-
Show this thread
-
very specific, and fucking stupid, definitions. lefties know these are garbage in their hearts, so they play word swap garbage. it's so a very limited frame can encompass more than it should, tricking idiots into thinking everything is solved by marxism.
Show this thread -
it's all fucking taqiyya, but quite brilliant. they signal very specific terms to eachother, but to small brain normies the words all signify "bad thing" and "owie :(" rotten fucks these marxists.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Alienation was one of the only things that Marx was correct about
-
nope. people aren't in a malaise because they don't get to decide what they make.
-
modernity is alienating. people's shit jobs are part of that. the banking system is incredibly alienating. corporate bureaucracies are alienating. etc. sorta parts of capitalism... it's not just "they don't get to decide what they make"... its the whole ball of wax.
-
the marxist definition is specifically about workers being seperated from control of their labor. would anything you mention be ameliorated under collective ownership? no.
-
obviously not. it's fuckin alienating tho isn't it?
-
you can be correct in diagnosis and wrong in cure
-
if a hypothesis claims a root cause, and directly addressing that cause changes nothing, the premise is wrong. my point is that the common usage of "alienation" is not the same as the marxist concept. modernity is alienating, but not by marx's definition of the term.
-
I don’t find white women sexually attractive
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.