Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Moving on to the Police claim it was always obvious that having sexual relationships by #spycops was wrong and that none of the officers would have tolerated it because it would invalidate MK's evidence
The Christopher Rose report is clear that it was always the primary intention that MK's identity should be protected over and above any prosecution. The only reason the Ratcliffe miscarriage of justice even came to light was because @JustLisa2010 discovered MK's true identity
In fact EN31's own statement makes it clear that until 2005 they had never approached the #spycops operations as an evidential, so for the entirety of my relationships with MK that was never the case.
The police defence in my case in 2012 was to state that my relationship with MK was authorised under RIPA and therefore was lawful for all intents and purposes and my case "could not succeed". A similar point was made by the police as late as 2016. It seems it wasn't obvious then
They say now that there was no need for written guidance because it was "obvious" no commanding officer would have tolerated it in 2004 is wrong. At least some of police employees still thought it was OK in 2016! It was always clear to them this was an abusive thing. #spycops
If they trying to claim Kennedy would give evidence in court, why did that never happen in his 7 years? Even though was he involved in several cases that went to court? The Ratcliffe 6 trial collapsed precisely *because* they'd rather drop charges than have Kennedy testify!
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
