This utilizes analyst consensus EBITDA estimates for 2020, which currently sits at $4.38 billion, a +5.6% upward revision over the past 3 months according to analysts polled by @ZATools:pic.twitter.com/Sv075ruyO0
Show this thread
-
-
-
By way of comparison,
$AMZN trades at 18.4X, a nominal difference.pic.twitter.com/7HsaWstATH
Show this thread -
As we all know, valuation multiples are a function of growth, among other things such as return on capital, WACC, etc.
$TSLA 4-year forward EBITDA growth (least squares) has been +52%pic.twitter.com/Myk7MPrwZo
Show this thread -
...versus
$AMZN's 4-year forward EBITDA growth (least squares) of +42%pic.twitter.com/SYRFbSowwH
Show this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s a decent comparison but it all comes down to tesla’s future growth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where are you getting this from? I have it at 25x. Also note that analysts have been way too high on Tesla profitability every single year for 10...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great charts! I use PS ratio (revenue multiple) a lot to evaluate Tesla. Wondering what is your thoughts on that? What is a good/fair PS ratio for Tesla? Or for any company at a similar growth rate and margin. Can we compare it with Apple? Thanks!
-
This is the chart I usedhttps://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/TSLA/tesla/price-sales …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.