Free Recall

@freerecall

Scientist. Humanist. Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts. - Henry Rosovsky

Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2014.
65 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @freerecall

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @freerecall

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    19. sij

    When I TAed in grad school, I submitted my final grades to the supervising professor, a gentleman I'd never met, and stated that I had attached an excel sheet with notes to clear up any "ambiguity" about interpreting the grades. Below is his reply:

    1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 3 sata
    Odgovor korisnicima

    In fact, the evidence on operant conditioning, environmental contingencies, and niche construction all contradict the notion that the environment is obstinate. The environment is a dynamical system, one that both changes and is changed by the organism.

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. 4. velj

    Yes, but natural language is not just about information transmission. Language may be necessary for other cognitive domains, such as numerical reasoning, theory of mind, etc. Any language algorithm, then, must also account for these other (seemly non-linguistic) abilities.

    If an algorithm has "mastered natural language", I would expect it to be able to do some of the things language is for -- communicating information, receiving information, acting on the world... Not merely output something that statistically sounds like language.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. sij

    Henri Poincare understood the importance of Relationism nearly a century ago. It's time we caught up: "The aim of science is not things themselves, as the dogmatists in their simplicity assume, but the relation among things; outside these relations there is no reality knowable.”

    1 reply 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 25. sij

    Henri Poincare understood the importance of Relationism nearly a century ago. It's time we caught up: "The aim of science is not things themselves, as the dogmatists in their simplicity assume, but the relation among things; outside these relations there is no reality knowable.”

    1 reply 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 25. sij

    1/2 We will not make scientific progress if we continue to relate "things" (e.g., gene variants, MRI differences, IQ scores) in a manner that is divorced from the underlying dynamics and interactions between the "things."
    Prikaži ovu nit
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 24. sij

    Overton (2013) on how Relationism overcomes dichotomies in science: "Context-free specifications of any object, event, or process-whether it be DNA, a cell, a neuron, evolution, the architecture of mind, or culture-is illegitimate within a holistic system"

    9 proslijeđenih tweetova 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. sij

    This semester I started doing vignettes of overlooked, but highly influential people in the history of comparative psychology/animal behavior. In this era of resurgent race "science" and innateness we need reminders of those who saw beyond these tropes, people like Ethel Tobach.

    12 proslijeđenih tweetova 26 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 16. sij

    We have a theory. It's dynamical systems theory, and we are just waiting for the rest of the field to catch up.

    There are a lot of calls for better theory in psych. The field seems ready to, after fixing its methods, invest substantial resources in this direction. Which means we should probably take a moment to reflect on whether this is a good idea. 1/7
    Prikaži ovu nit
    1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  10. 16. sij

    Internal models are a pervasive construct in the neurosciences. But is that really the right way to conceptualize perception-action systems? Lackner & Tuller (2008) on how we can recast internal models as dynamical systems.

    10 proslijeđenih tweetova 26 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. 7. sij

    Blumberg et al. on how "innate" spinal circuits in rats result from spontaneous twitching: "Our experiments show how patterns of twitching contribute to the self-organized differentiation of the most basic spinal circuits--circuits long considered innate:"

    1 reply 7 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. sij

    With resurgent online hereditarianism researchers need to accurately communicate how biological processes occur. An under-appreciated book is "Tools for Thought" by Conrad Waddington where he lays out how to think in systems, and how to apply systems thinking to development.

    13 proslijeđenih tweetova 44 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. 3. sij

    The has re-invigorated the nature-nurture debate (e.g. innate priors, learnability) on Twitter. I fear, though, that regressing to this dichotomy fails to acknowledge the self-organizing & pattern-forming nature of ontogeny. Here, I return to van Geert (2003)'s remarks:

    1 reply 11 proslijeđenih tweetova 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    There are an increasing number of studies showing transcriptional differences in genetically identical individuals very early in development though, and something has to be modulating this.

    5 proslijeđenih tweetova 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    These findings demonstrate how robust, species-typical behaviors that would appear to require "innate" knowledge may actually reflect non-obvious forms of experience. Moreover, multiple sources of non-obvious experiences can produce the same "instinct:"

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    The AI, ML, Neuroscience, and Cognitive Science communities have much to learn from ethology and comparative psychology re: nature-nurture, a dichotomy eloquently refuted by Lehrman (1953):

    5 proslijeđenih tweetova 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. 29. pro 2019.

    Our hands influence the perception of our bodily dimensions. Fascinating and strange experiments from Lackner and Tuller (2008):

    4 proslijeđena tweeta 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. 28. pro 2019.

    Smith & Thelen (2003) on development as a dynamical system: 1) no single element of the developmental system has causal priority and 2) development is temporally & hierarchically nested, with activity on one timescale influencing the rest:

    7 proslijeđenih tweetova 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. stu 2019.

    The psychology-as-software and neural-systems-as-hardware metaphor ultimately fails, as neural systems change themselves through their own activity - activity involved in perception-action. Thus, for real neural systems, "software" and "hardware" are always inextricably linked.

    1 reply 8 proslijeđenih tweetova 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. 24. pro 2019.

    Starting a genomics-themed waffle house called GWAffleS.

    Starting a genomics-themed barber shop called SNPs
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@freerecall još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·