No. I remember reading that too
-
-
-
GAH. I just can't find the link and it's not proving easily googleable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You're not mixed up. I remember it too, but I've had trouble tracking it down.
-
It's complicated by the fact that the man's narrative never mentions Clarke by name.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I remember this as well, but I can't place where, I'm sorry.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
See here: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/arthur-c-clarke-case-investigated-1145468.html … But the tricky thing is that the "boys" haven't come forward, and what little we know (and we don't know much) suggests that they were over the age of consent in the UK in 2018.
-
No, it's not that article. This was a piece written by someone who was a child in the 70s and met him.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
do you mean this https://twitter.com/jasonsanford/status/887473721652510721 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
Yes! That's it, thank you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I have never seen any evidence (ie not just general allegations) that he was involved with boys under the age of 16. But note that when he went to Sri Lanka the age of consent in the UK was 21.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.