He's not queer. He fucks lots of things of varying species and genders. Mortal sexuality really doesn't apply to him.
-
-
Replying to @LeviGratton @fozmeadows
I also think the majority of 'bigots' are just annoyed that Marvel keep retooling existing characters from long standing, familiar histories and personalities this way. Sure, the new thing could be good, but they don't like it when the old thing is gone because of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeviGratton
The old thing isn’t gone, though. It’s not erased, any more than each new comics universe upgrade erases the previous ones. It’s an addition, an expansion. They just don’t want it to include particular types of person. And Loki was ALREADY queer in comics.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fozmeadows
Didn't he have a daughter? And again I think mortal sexual orientations don't apply to immortal shape shifting ethereal beings.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeviGratton
Having a daughter doesn’t preclude queerness, and given that human beings are the ones constructing and reading the stories about immortal shapeshifters, I feel like we’re within our rights to apply whatever human descriptive terms we like to their preferences.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
I mean, if you want to do it that much, I won't stop you, but thinking about it in universe it doesn't really make sense. As for the daughter situation, no it doesn't. It's just he used to be straight, then a new writer made him bisexual, that's how some fans see it, I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeviGratton
If you think it makes less sense to describe an immortal shapeshifter as queer than to write an immortal shapeshifter in the first place, then I don’t know what to tell you except that the current writer, the one copping abuse, isn’t *making* him queer; the comics already did.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fozmeadows
I'm saying if we want to go all in on 'go by what the universe goes by' then the definition of Loki by mortal sexuality is pointless. If we're going to go by defining it via out of world writing, this character was just turned queer recently, to some people's dislike. 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeviGratton
So what you’re saying is that words like “queer” can’t POSSIBLY exist in-universe or be used externally to describe the characters by readers looking for queer rep in those stories. But if you’re COMPLAINING about queerness, then sure, the word applies. Riiiiight.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fozmeadows
I didn't say that. You did. But now you're trying to paint aggression and derision where it doesn't exist. There are plenty of gay characters in Marvel. Ice Man had that big reveal. Deadpool is pretty openly omnisexual. I just don't agree about shape shifters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Dude. I’m genderqueer and bisexual. And what you’re saying, right now, is that you think having a character being gendefluid in some respect means they can’t be queer along other axes. And my queerass self begs STRONGLY to differ.
-
-
Replying to @fozmeadows
I'm saying that this character is in a different level of cosmic existence than you, and that you're current biological, psychological and emotional level is not the same because it's an ethereal super being that can literally turn into a worm and fuck other worms.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeviGratton
What you’re saying is that applying magic, fictional dimensions to an otherwise real concept means we can’t talk about that concept using real terms, even though the link between them is obvious. Which is bullshit.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.