There is literally no reason for Guy Ritchie's King Arthur to be Arthurian except to make the East End the *real* British heritage.
-
-
But I mean. For fuck's sake, would it have killed them to give the one material female character an actual NAME, instead of just "the Mage"?
-
Bold assertion: no Arthurian movie has ever been as good as it could be because they all centre the men over the women.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.