There is literally no reason for Guy Ritchie's King Arthur to be Arthurian except to make the East End the *real* British heritage.
-
-
Lack of dragons is *always* a mistake.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But, on the plus side, I will give props to a racially diverse Roman-era Londinium and a Round Table rooted in working class knights.
-
I mean, yeah, letting Arthur have a Kung-fu buddy is a little naff, but they don't show him actually using martial arts ever, so [ehh noise]
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Which is why Pelennor Fields is the best fantasy movie battle: nazgul steeds and oliphaunts, oh my!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've not seen the film, but possibly a reaction to GoT's current cultural position? Can't outdo their dragons, so take a different approach.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a solid life rule
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The lack of dragons in *most* things is a Mistake, imo.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.