Thread: I've seen it argued that we shouldn't refer to Trump as Trump anymore, because his name is his brand. And there's merit to that! BUT
-
-
Replying to @fozmeadows
At this point, I feel like trying to distance Trump from his brand can only have the effect of separating the brand from Trump's many evils.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
Call him Trump. Emphasise the association, and let the brand fall with the man. Let the entire broken, bloated edifice of his ego collapse.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
He's the one, after all, who brought his dumb brand into politics; don't let it survive his impeachment by treating it as a separate thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
By all means, let's keep using his first name to demean him in contexts where he'd prefer to be a brand, and don't ease up on the insults!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
But come the day his greasy heirs want to rehabilitate the Trump brand without him, let's make that fucking impossible. Make him OWN IT.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
I also move that the usage of 'mandarin' as a racist insult, as in 'jumped-up mandarin', hereby be replaced in perpetuity with 'Spicer'.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
Let the ironic legacy of these men who can't respect, use or understand language be that their names are turned into & remembered as jokes.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
FIN.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.