Acknowledging subjectivity, to the objectivist, is frequently & falsely strawmanned as either "nothing is real" or "morality is relative".
-
-
Replying to @fozmeadows
This is why, for instance, Creationists think it's hypocritical of scientists to teach evolution, but not creationism. Their logic says:
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
"If science can self-correct and admit the possibility of error, then LOGICALLY *any* theory must be as valid as any other, including mine!"
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
They don't see this as a fallacy because they don't understand that acknowledging subjectivity doesn't preclude a belief in verifiable fact.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
Facts exist independently of individual opinions about them: the subjective element is how people choose to interpret, define & use them.
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
But to an objectivist, it's outrageous to suggest *their* Immutable Truth might NOT be true; any "fact" to this effect is therefore suspect.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
If any so-called "fact" upsets a True Believer's worldview, the only thing it proves to them is that "facts" are fundamentally negotiable.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
Which is why we now have people like Conway and Spicer talking about "alternative facts", as though such a concept actually makes sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
As a teenager learning about subjectivity/objectivity, what terrified me was the realisation of how precarious our modern knowledgebase is.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
The modern world is so vastly huge & complex that no one person can ever understand *everything* underpinning it, so we rely a LOT on trust.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
Trust in the scientific method, journalistic integrity, educational institutions, politicians; trust in the accurate spread of information.
-
-
Replying to @fozmeadows
We've always tried to hold our various institutions accountable, have always pushed back against or pushed for particular findings. But now-
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fozmeadows
Now, we have the internet, where anyone can potentially learn anything, where very little is vetted, and where trust is easy to gain.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.