@hawkwing_lb You're confusing it with a critical essay, which is a much more specialized taste and something most people don't care about.
-
-
Replying to @matociquala
@matociquala But how can one review without critical analysis? HOW IS THIS A POSSIBLE THING MY HEAD MIGHT EXPLODE.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hawkwing_lb
@hawkwing_lb It's possible to review with critical analysis and without too major spoilers.@ebertchicago was pretty good at it, rest him.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @matociquala
@matociquala What really annoys me is when *specific* spoilers have been carefully avoided and people still say WHY NO SPOILER WARNING. *g*2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hawkwing_lb
@hawkwing_lb Because spoiler warnings are a part of the internet culture of politeness, basically. Because they help people filter.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @matociquala
@matociquala Agree to disagree on spoiler warnings, I hope, since I expect all reviews to spoiler & am disappointed when they don't.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hawkwing_lb
@hawkwing_lb ...are a part of online politeness culture. You can observe that or you can piss people off. *g*5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @matociquala
@matociquala + sometimes really stifles discussion and emotional honesty in responding to things. I dunno. Is a thing I am thinking about.6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@hawkwing_lb @matociquala the book successful in the first place; or at the least, of deciding/experiencing it for themselves. But otherwise
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.