RT @fozmeadows: I respond at @HuffPostBooks to Peter Stothard's claim that book bloggers are ruining literaturehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/foz-meadows/book-bloggers-vs-literary_b_1915867.html …
-
-
Replying to @HuffPostBooks
@fozmeadows@HuffPostBooks His point about blogs true in most cases - riddled with ignorance and prejudice (a pity for the many good ones)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ruppinagency
@tintiddle There's a big difference between acknowledging the existence of subpar blogs & saying book blogging is ruining literature, though
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
@fozmeadows That's not how I read it: more that good media coverage is being replaced by a few good blogs and too many poor ones.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ruppinagency
@tintiddle Possibly; but combined with his remarks re readability/page-turners, he reads as being more anti-popular than anti poor quality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
@fozmeadows I chatted with him a couple of weeks ago and I took it that he thinks popularity is irrelevant - it's all about quality.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@tintiddle I'd be more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt if I had evidence he read all genres, not just widely within litfic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.