I've been thinking about this on and off all day, so apparently I'm doing a thread about GRRM, my experience with the Hugo Losers party, and why his behaviour at the awards last year was a problem. Here we go!https://twitter.com/fozmeadows/status/1382797565981122565 …
-
-
The one commonality to all these parties was that, regardless of the size of the venue, GRRM, as the man paying for and organising everything, was there himself, handing out loser ribbons and, at a certain point in the evening, getting on stage to talk about worldcons past.
Show this thread -
Here's the thing: I would be 100% lying if I claimed that, at any point while enjoying those parties, I'd stopped to consider why such an important event was technically not an "official" part of the con, but run autonomously alongside it. But I think about it now.
Show this thread -
By the accounts of others, it seems I was very lucky to end up at two of his fancy afters in years where the venues were both accessible and large enough for the attendees, and where no major fuckups happened around the events themselves. But those fuckups DID happen elsewhere.
Show this thread -
Whenever GRRM and his friends got up during the losers' parties to talk about the good old days or give their own awards out, as happened in 2016, even if it was repetitive, I'd think, 'ah, but he's bankrolling this thing, doesn't that entitle him to it?' And THAT'S the issue.
Show this thread -
GRRM has a long history with both Worldcon and the Hugos, but he isn't officially part of the con staff; he is not beholden to it. And while, yes, he is indeed the founder of the losers party, which once upon a time was a much more informal thing...
Show this thread -
...the question becomes: does he want the event to be his playground, or his legacy? Because it can't be both, and now that it's such an opulent, shiny-status Thing To Attend, he's treating it as the former at the expense of the latter, and thus of the Hugos themselves.
Show this thread -
When you get up, year after year, and tell increasingly diverse groups of Hugo winners and losers the same stories about you and your buddies, without acknowledging the development of the field the awards are meant to honor, it's not about the Hugos. It's about ego.
Show this thread -
I can't imagine what it feels like to have started such a gathering off as a kind of inside joke, to watch it grow and become series, to have it become part of the proceedings, and to finally have the money to make it a big deal, only to then be faulted for that. I'm sympathetic!
Show this thread -
But things change. Contexts change. Meanings change. You cannot simultaneously be One Of The Regular Guys just hosting a drinks for your friends while simultaneously being one of the richest, most well-known figures in the field. There's an obvious conflict there -
Show this thread -
- and that conflict becomes extremely stark and extremely troubling in the context of the Hugos themselves, where the defining celebration of the awards is held somehow *apart* from those awards, under the auspices of a single individual.
Show this thread -
Which is why, I believe, what happened with GRRM and the 2020 Hugos livestream happened the way it did. GRRM is *used* to feeling entitled to the stage at the Hugos. There was no losers party, so he used the awards ceremony to tell the stories he usually tells at his own event -
Show this thread -
- but at far greater length, with far greater indulgence, and at the expense of that year's nominees. That he was evidently blindsided and thus upset by the criticism he received for it likewise tracks: why would he expect it, when he's never criticised at the afterparty?
Show this thread -
It should be no surprise that, after years of autonomously hosting the Hugo losers party, GRRM conflated his entitlement to a stage he paid for with entitlement to the awards themselves. He saw no reason to adjust his schitck, and in doing so insulted and alienated the nominees.
Show this thread -
GRRM was hurt by the criticism because, I believe, on some level, he's come to think of the Hugos as *his*, like he's their patron or godfather. He might not decide who gets on the ballot, but he controls the big party that everyone wants to go to, and shouldn't that count?
Show this thread -
Which is why, for all I've enjoyed his parties in the past, I say that he now must choose between making the event his legacy and continuing to treat it as a private playground, wherein he reigns as a kindly benefactor, entitled to adoration and time because of status and money.
Show this thread -
He could, for instance, turn over the management of the party to the con itself, perhaps by putting some money in trust so that each con, each year can afford to show the nominees and winners a good time. He could be a lifetime guest, honored as a founder - but not as a host.
Show this thread -
Alternately, he could take his ball and go home, leaving worldcon to fill the void with an event and budget of their own design; because frankly, an awards ceremony SHOULD have a party! But there would be no legacy in this for him; just an angry end.
Show this thread -
Or he could just... keep doing what he's doing, and worldcon can keep letting him: having the singular event associated with the awards run by someone who isn't part of the con every single year, so that the concom can only shrug apologetically whenever there's a cockup.
Show this thread -
I appreciate the love GRRM has for the Hugos as an institution, but the institution is not the same as the people who comprise it, who appear on the ballots each year, and when his parties and nostalgic speechifying alienate those people... who or what is he serving, really?
Show this thread -
If GRRM and worldcon want the Hugos to both retain the legacy they already have while continuing to have a future, then the issue of how the ceremony is handled, who runs the parties and who is included in both will need to be dealt with sooner rather than later.
Show this thread -
-
minor correction - I somehow typed that GoT was in its first season in 2014 instead of its third. d'oh!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.