This was back when I was with Ford Street Publishing, a local Melbourne indie; again, it's *possible* Paul, who runs Ford Street, reached out to Nalini for promo for my books, but if so I was unaware of it, and I've got no record of any other email contact with her.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @fozmeadows
and your point? That makes it ok to incite a pile on while deliberately missing the entire point of my blog post?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DarkMatterzine
Nobody has missed the point of your blog post, let alone intentionally. Nor was I the first person to stumble on it and react with outrage; I was about the eighth, so if you want to accuse anyone of "inciting" a pile-on, look elsewhere. You're being criticised legitimately.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
-
Replying to @DarkMatterzine
This, right here? THIS is what you're being criticised for: the idea that being partially out for your own safety, or out only in certain contexts, is bad. The all-or-nothing idea IS GATEKEEPING, and particularly for, say, trans folk? Being out *everywhere* IS DANGEROUS.pic.twitter.com/YjOd1Tr3YS
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows @DarkMatterzine
"people coming out of the closet to snatch the goodies before retreating back into the closet" - this is about personal comfort & often survival. Nobody is obliged to be out *all the fucking time* about every aspect of their marginalisation to be able to claim
#ownvoices.1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows @DarkMatterzine
The idea that people HAVE to expose themselves to the maximum amount of suffering and vulnerability or you won't consider them valid? The subsequent revelation that you OUTED A WRITER because YOU, personally, were offended by their silence? THIS IS REALLY SHITTY.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows @DarkMatterzine
Given the fact that, by your own account, you lost a job because of your disability, you'd think you might be sympathetic to other people wanting to stay employed by not disclosing their disabilities to their employers, but no. You WANT people to risk being fired.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
No. I'm saying that if you want to hide the fact of your disability, don't then use that disability for personal gain on the rare occasion you think it will benefit you. Don't have it both ways. I said that at the beginning and consistently throughout.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DarkMatterzine
Yes, you said it consistently AND THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ARE OBJECTING TO. You cannot seem to comprehend that the core of your point, correctly identified, is what people are saying sucks. Because it DOES suck.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes
What you're saying is, "if revealing your marginalisation might cost you work or social opportunities in some contexts or cause you to risk violence, so you don't share it everywhere, you are NOT allowed to write about for money." Why? What's the sense in that?
-
-
Replying to @fozmeadows
I did not say that. I specifically and explicitly did not say that. If you look at the original post and at my follow up, I explicitly stated that people can write identities they don't own but they must do research and write respectfully.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DarkMatterzine
Yes, you did. You said that if POC ever passed as white, if Muslims ever passed as not Muslim, then they're not ownvoices; your line in the sand was that people be out at all times, in all contexts, or it wouldn't count.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.