does 'acting like it's a trial' simply mean 'refusing to agree with you while also not going away'? because. I mean.
-
-
Replying to @fozmeadows
no it just means that you're acting like i'm antagonizing you when you keep giving right back. like are you not antagonizing me if that's the definition? maybe just stop and agree to disagree.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lecteronthelam @fozmeadows
i genuinely don't need or expect you to agree with me. that's not even the point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lecteronthelam
if you didn't expect or want me to listen from the outset and had no serious intention of trying to talk me around, then the only possible explanation for getting in my mentions is bad faith engagement.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
Yeah see that's where your wrong. When I see something that need contextualization, I do that. I contextualize. Bc even if it's talking to a brick wall, other people are watching. And I'm at heart an eternal optimist. And maybe there's an outside chance I'll get through.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lecteronthelam
but you didn't do that until multiple replies in. before that it was 'insult, snarky summarisation, accusation that my entire post was pointless and stating the obvious.' if that's what contextualisation looks like to you, your setup needs work
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Lecteronthelam
so listen. I have other stuff to do, but I have two sincere questions for you before I log off. would you be willing to answer them?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
I can't say yes before I know what they are but I'm game.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lecteronthelam
one: if someone wrote a detailed post about a specific aspect of racism that mentioned, as part of the setup and conclusion, that white people are racist, would you want them to contextualise by adding "not all white people?"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
two: do you believe that the majority of people referred to as antis are not actually antis (in the sense of being either self-professed or in denial about how closely their views align with those of self-professed antis)?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.