yeah but i'm not the one acting like it's a trial.
one: if someone wrote a detailed post about a specific aspect of racism that mentioned, as part of the setup and conclusion, that white people are racist, would you want them to contextualise by adding "not all white people?"
-
-
two: do you believe that the majority of people referred to as antis are not actually antis (in the sense of being either self-professed or in denial about how closely their views align with those of self-professed antis)?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
this is a weird question that reveals more about you than about me based on any answer I could give. why would you even ask that? notwithstanding that, most "not all" rebuttals are deflection/evasion if that helps you on whatever dive you're into.
-
I'm asking because your big objection to my post was "not all antis (or people called antis)," so I wondered if you felt like clarifying "not all [group]" was necessary in other discousive contexts.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.