it was adversarial for sure, but not ad hominem. it was based on your self-serving recitation that omitted any kind of counterpoint. i'm sorry (i guess) if you took that personally rather than as a moment to reflect on whether you could have been more considered.
but you didn't do that until multiple replies in. before that it was 'insult, snarky summarisation, accusation that my entire post was pointless and stating the obvious.' if that's what contextualisation looks like to you, your setup needs work
-
-
I'll take that under advisement.
-
so listen. I have other stuff to do, but I have two sincere questions for you before I log off. would you be willing to answer them?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.