if it's not - please do specify that the only people you're talking about are those that are self-proclaimed antis and if anyone wants to apply this to others they're wrong and you denounce any such extrapolation.
how was my post self-serving? why was I obliged to provide a counterpoint? and in what universe would you assume that approaching a stranger with an adversarial statement would prompt instant reflection rather than the thought that 'hey, that person's being a jerk'?
-
-
you're not obligated to provide a counterpoint. you're also not obligated to engage with people who disagree with your main point. and yet you are.
-
I could say the same to you, the person who started this. kind of hypocritical to criticise me for continuing a conversation that you started and are also continuing.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.