what rando, pray? I'm talking about self-described antis. you're the one who's come in, ignored the entire content of what I've written, and decided to say 'but actually some people get called antis who aren't,' as though that changes my point about fantasy vs reality.
you insulted me by saying I only care about fiction affecting reality if I can use it to dunk on someone. explain to me how that's not a hostile opening statement.
-
-
it was adversarial for sure, but not ad hominem. it was based on your self-serving recitation that omitted any kind of counterpoint. i'm sorry (i guess) if you took that personally rather than as a moment to reflect on whether you could have been more considered.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.