what's your claim, here: that people with the same beliefs as antis minus the decision to actively harass others ought to be exempt from having their logic critiqued unless "not all antis" is specifically stipulated?
I said there are antis who self-identify as such and that this is how the term is overwhelmingly used; you're the one trying to nitpick. and you didn't answer the question.
-
-
No actually you defined antis as those who label themselves as such. And you didn't answer my question regarding why you revised your definition.
-
I revised my definition because you demanded that I exonerate everyone to whom the anti label is applied, regardless of applicability. I established the definition in the first place because you claimed it was misapplied rather than self-professed.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.