what's your claim, here: that people with the same beliefs as antis minus the decision to actively harass others ought to be exempt from having their logic critiqued unless "not all antis" is specifically stipulated?
-
-
Replying to @fozmeadows
my claim is simply that when you use the term, knowing that it has been applied to people who don't harass, who have legitimate critiques of fandom, that you're throwing them into the same grinder. and you know it. and apparently you don't care.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lecteronthelam @fozmeadows
you can "critique their logic" all day. but critique *their* logic. not the logic of some rando who you decided speaks for them
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lecteronthelam
what rando, pray? I'm talking about self-described antis. you're the one who's come in, ignored the entire content of what I've written, and decided to say 'but actually some people get called antis who aren't,' as though that changes my point about fantasy vs reality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
it does change your point. bc if your point was limited to "self proclamed antis" no one would care bc lbr there aren't many of those. but your aim is broader than that. isn't it?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @Lecteronthelam @fozmeadows
and let's quit playing this is my first day on Twitter/in fandom discourse dilettante bullshit
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lecteronthelam
your first interaction with me was an ad hominem claim that I don't care about how fiction affects reality and only want to attack people. you've been hostile and engaged in bad faith since then. I don't owe you agreement just because you want it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
That's a really nice scripted reply and a prelude to noping out. Feel free
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
the fact that your bio says you teach communications and media studies when this is how you parse texts and engage with strangers is genuinely worrying
-
-
Replying to @fozmeadows
ah there it is. that's a genuine ad hominem. thank you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.